In retrospect, a more precise scope is also needed.More effort should be focused on the computer vision to realize the main aim of autonomously refereeing the game of football, as it will mean that many of the issues relating to drone hardware and controls would most likely be unnecessary anyway.For the future, it is advised to invest in more Crazyflie hardware as this will allow more scope for working in parallel, and it is often the case that things break on the drone because it often crashes.People tend to carry mobile phones around with them anyway, so the improved cost efficiency is also a moot point.For the indoor field at TU/e specifically, the football field is small enough that a single static camera from a mobile phone can pick up most of the events on the field with little latency.This would heavily restrict options for drone movement. Notwithstanding safety, it would also distract the players.It would not be safe to have this drone near the players or the crowd. While the suggested strategy of a flying drone is fine for a robot game inside a drone cage, for an outdoor game between humans, a more powerful drone would be required to overcome adverse weather conditions. ![]() The ball position relative to the field has been determined using computer vision.There were also unavoidable project bottlenecks resulting from setting up the drone that meant that many things could not be worked on in parallel.As experienced with previous groups, the drone hardware proved to be temperamental, and fire-fighting small technicalities related to this took up large chunks of the time. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |